finally the band came out. there were TEN of them! if you can't see the pics too closely, there was a chello, pipe organ, accordian, two violins, french horns, trumpets, all kinds of drums, guitars, bass, synth, megaphones, and a tambourine or two. you can only imagine. uhh...or listen to song #4 (Intervention) on Neon Bible - their latest cd. the live music was phenomenal. the selection of songs, awesome. the performance, outstanding. a concert to be remembered. i love arcade fire.
now as i stood and people-watched my way through the concert, i decided that there are 4 types of concert goers.
type #1 - stand still and listen. these people look very serious while they listen to and watch the concert. you might mistake them for not having a good time but they are. they take their music seriously. they are usually huge fans.
type #2 - grooving but not lifting the feet. these people enjoy the rhythms and want to move around but they are somewhat inhibited by the people around them. they enjoy the music but maybe are not as hard core as the other 3 types though there are always exceptions to the type.
type #3 - moving the feet. these people are loving the music and are moving their feet but staying in one spot. a little groovier. there are all levels of committment to the music within this type - from "i'm a hard core fan"s to "i came to the concert with my friend because they had an extra ticket"s.
type #4 - full out dancing. there are the fewest of this type at a concert. they need some room. who knows if they're moved by the music or if they just like attention. (no offence if this is you...i just don't know anyone of this type in order to deeper research my theories)
and so...those are my thoughts on concert goers. can you guess which type i am? haha.

brian's hunt by gary paulsen. if you're read hatchet, this is one of the sequels. it's new. if you haven't read hatchet, get to your public library today.

stargirl by jerry spinelli. i've read it many times but i like to reread good ones. i just gave a copy to katie last week and it made me think, "i should re-read this one again."
divine secrets of the ya-ya sisterhood by rebecca wells. saw the movie and didn't like it that much but i thought i'd give the book a try. maybe the movie just wasn't as good as the book. that's usually the case, right?









